Six-Month Outcomes Correlate with 10-Year Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To identify whether 6-month outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAIS correlate with outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from 2012-2013 were reviewed and included if they had 6-month and minimum 10-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures included Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scales for Pain (VAS-P) and Satisfaction (VAS-S). Six-month and 10-year outcome scores were compared and the relationships between 6-month and 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year outcome scores were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). 6-month scores and clinically significant outcome (CSO) achievement were then compared to 10-year CSO achievement and reoperations, including revision hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion, using logistic regressions and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Sixty patients (60.0% female, age: 36.0±12.2 years) were included. mHHS, VAS-P, and VAS-S significantly improved from 6-month to 10-year follow-up (p≤0.021), while HOS-ADL and HOS-SS did not (p≥0.072). There were significant correlations between 6-month and 10-year scores for HOS-ADL (r=0.505), HOS-SS (r=0.592), and mHHS (r=0.362, p≤0.022 for all), as well as significant correlations between 6-month and 1-, 2-, and 5-year scores (p<0.014, for all). 6-month HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were all significantly associated with their respective 10-year PASS achievement (p≤0.044). Furthermore, 6-month HOS-ADL and mHHS were significantly associated with THA conversion (p≤0.041). Comparable 6-month and 10-year minimal clinically important difference (96.5% vs. 97.8%, p=1.000) and patient acceptable symptom state (85.2% vs. 87.5%, p=1.000) achievement for any PRO was observed. CONCLUSION: Following hip arthroscopy for FAIS, patients' 6-month HOS-ADL and mHHS scores were significantly associated with their 10-year PROs, PASS achievement, and THA conversion; although, correlation strengths decreased with increasing time from surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Patients with Lateral and Anterolateral Cam Morphology Have Greater Deformities Versus Typical Anterolateral Deformity Alone, but No Differences in Postoperative Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To compare pre- and post-operative findings between patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) with lateral impingement versus those without lateral impingement METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2012-2017 with minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Alpha angle (AA) was measured on preoperative AP and 90° Dunn radiographs. Patients with AA > 60° on Dunn view but not AP view (no lateral impingement) were propensity matched by sex, age, and BMI in a 1:3 ratio to patients with AA > 60° on both views (lateral impingement). Demographic characteristics, radiographic and intraoperative findings, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between groups. Categorical variables were compared us Fisher's exact testing and continuous variable using two-tailed student's t tests. RESULTS: Sixty patients with lateral impingement (65.0% female, age: 35.3 ± 13.0 years) were matched to 180 patients without lateral impingement (65.0% female, age: 34.7 ± 12.5 years, p ≥ 0.279). Lateral impingement patients had larger preoperative AAs on both Dunn (71.0° ± 8.8° vs. 67.6° ± 6.1°, p = 0.001) and AP radiographs (79.0° ± 12.1° vs. 48.2° ± 6.5°, p < 0.001). However, there were no differences in postoperative AAs on either view (Dunn: 39.0° ± 6.1° vs. 40.5° ± 5.3°, AP: 45.8° ± 9.0° vs. 44.9° ± 7.0°, p ≥ 0.074). Labral tears began more superiorly in patients with lateral impingement (12:00 ± 0:49 vs. 12:17 ± 0:41, p = 0.030), and theydemonstrated higher rates of acetabular and femoral cartilage damage (p = 0.030 for both); however, there were no differences in PROs or reoperation rates between the groups at 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although cam deformities located laterally and anterolaterally are larger than those located anterolaterally alone, both can be resected adequately, resulting in similar postoperative radiographic measurements, PROs, and survivorship.

Computer-Assisted Arthroscopic Cam Resection.

Determining the appropriate femoral cam resection during hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is both critical for the patient and challenging for the surgeon. Incomplete bone resection is a leading cause of failed hip arthroscopy, whereas over-resection may increase the risk of femoral neck fracture. The alpha angle is a validated 2-dimensional radiographic measurement used to both diagnose femoroacetabular impingement syndrome preoperatively and to determine resection adequacy postoperatively. Computer-assisted intraoperative guidance systems enhance the accuracy of femoral cam resection, although a preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography scan may be required. Other systems, such as the HipCheck software (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI), have been developed to provide intraoperative guidance with live feedback using simultaneous alpha angle measurements overlayed on fluoroscopic images without the requirement for routine preoperative computed tomography. Via intraoperative touchscreen navigation, the surgeon identifies the midpoint of the femoral neck and femoral head. A commercial software program provides real-time alpha angle measurements, as well as enhanced visualization of the femoral cam deformity with an adjustable resection curve. Before the surgeon performs the cam resection, the software provides a template for appropriate resection depth in 6 positions of the hip. Upon completion of the femoral cam resection, the hip is again assessed in the same 6 positions and the alpha angle is assessed to ensure a complete resection.

Cartilage Defects Are Negatively Associated With Long-Term Hip Survivorship Following Contemporary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To identify the timing and risk factors associated with secondary surgery following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at 10-year minimum follow-up. METHODS: A prospectively collected clinical repository was evaluated for cases of primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013 with minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent secondary surgery were propensity matched 1:4 to patients who did not undergo secondary surgery, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The groups were compared on demographics, radiographs, intraoperative findings, operative procedures, and patient-reported outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve was generated. Among the reoperation-free survivors, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement were recorded for Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain). RESULTS: Twenty-four reoperation patients (67% female; age 40.1 ± 14.3 years; BMI 27.2 ± 5.5) were matched to 96 reoperation-free patients (62% female; age 37.0 ± 10.8 years; BMI 25.2 ± 4.7, P ≥ .111). Mean follow-up was 10.3 ± 0.2 years. No preoperative demographic differences were found between groups. The reoperation group showed more high-grade cartilage defects on the acetabulum and femoral head (33% vs 8%, P = .004; 29% vs 7%, P = .007). A bimodal distribution of time to reoperation was evidenced independent of the secondary surgery performed. Among the reoperation-free survivors, MCID and PASS achievement was as follows: HOS-ADL (69.1%, 62.1%), HOS-SS (69.9%, 74.4%), mHHS (73.3%, 58.1%), iHOT-12 (n/a, 63.8%), and VAS-Pain (80.2%, 62.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring reoperation following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS demonstrated more severe cartilage defects and a bimodal distribution of time to reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Outcomes of Isolated Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair Compared With Concomitant Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair and Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Background: Both gluteal and labral tears are common sources of hip pain, but no studies have evaluated how concomitant arthroscopic labral repair and correction of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) affect outcomes after endoscopic gluteus/minimus repair. Purpose: (1) To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinically significant outcomes achievements between patients who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus and arthroscopic hip labral repair with correction of FAIS versus endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus repair without labral repair and (2) to define threshold scores required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool, and visual analog scale for pain in these patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus repair between 2012 and 2020 were identified. Those who underwent concomitant arthroscopic labral repair and correction of FAIS with femoroplasty or acetabuloplasty as indicated were propensity matched in a 1 to 1 ratio by sex, age, and body mass index to patients who underwent gluteus medius/minimus repair without labral repair. Patients who completed the study PROs were assessed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Threshold scores required to achieve the MCID and PASS thresholds were calculated. Results: A total of 32 patients who underwent simultaneous gluteal and labral repair (G+L) were matched to 32 patients who underwent gluteal repair without labral repair (G); 75% of patients in the G cohort underwent labral debridement, while 25% in this cohort received no labral treatment. A significant difference was observed between groups in preoperative mHHS scores (G+L, 54.4 ± 12.9 vs G, 46.3 ± 14; P = .048) but no differences in any other PRO scores (P≥ .207). The MCID/PASS thresholds were as follows: Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (11.14/83.82), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (16.07/59.72), mHHS (11.47/70.95), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (13.73/45.49), and visual analog scale for pain (14.30/22). There were no significant differences in MCID or PASS achievement rates between the 2 groups (P≥ .108). Conclusion: Patients who underwent combined G+L demonstrated comparable PROs and clinically significant outcomes achievement rates to patients who underwent G, highlighting sustained successful outcomes for patients with gluteal tendon pathology and concomitant FAIS and labral tears.

Patients Aged 40 Years and Older Demonstrate Durable and Comparable Results to Patients Aged Less Than 40 Years After Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity Matched Study at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes and rates of secondary surgery, including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), after primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients ≥40 years of age at minimum 10-year follow-up compared with a propensity-matched control group of patients <40 years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013. Patients ≥40 years old were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio by sex and body mass index to patients <40 years old. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including Hip Outcome Score for Activities of Daily Living and Sports-Specific subscales, modified Harris Hip, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and Visual Analog Scale for Pain and Satisfaction were collected. Rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) achievement at 10 years were evaluated and compared between groups. Rates of secondary surgery including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to THA were evaluated. Gross survivorship between cohorts was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients aged ≥40 (age 48.3 ± 5.8 years) were successfully matched to 53 patients aged <40 (age: 28.9 ± 7.2, <0.001). There were no other preoperative group differences regarding patient demographics, characteristics, or radiographic findings. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement regarding all PROs at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was noted between cohorts regarding any delta (preoperative to 10-year postoperative) scores (P > .05 for all). High rates of MCID and PASS achievement were achieved in both cohorts, with no significant differences in any PRO measure (P > .05 for all). No significant differences in rates of complications (age ≥40: 2.0%, age <40: 7.7%, P = .363), rates of revision (age ≥40: 7.5%, age <40: 9.4%, P = .999), or conversion to THA (age ≥40: 13.2%, age <40: 3.8%, P = .161) were identified. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, no significant difference (P = .321) was demonstrated in overall gross survivorship between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Patients with age ≥40 with FAIS undergoing primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated durable and comparable 10-year PRO and rates of MCID and PASS achievement compared with a propensity-matched cohort of age <40 counterparts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Functional Outcome Scores and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Patients With Tönnis Grade 1 Versus Grade 0 Arthritis: A Propensity-Matched Study at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy has become the mainstay surgical intervention for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). However, postoperative outcomes and rates of secondary surgery are mixed in patients with differing levels of preoperative osteoarthritis (OA). Furthermore, there is a paucity of literature comparing patients with and without OA at long-term follow-up. PURPOSE: To compare outcomes and rates of secondary surgery at minimum 10-year follow-up, including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), in patients with Tönnis grade 1 undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS compared with a propensity-matched control group of patients with Tönnis grade 0. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013 were identified. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 were propensity matched in a 1:2 ratio by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to patients with Tönnis grade 0. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at varying timepoints including preoperatively and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively and compared between the 2 cohorts. Rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) achievement at 10 years were evaluated and compared between groups. Rates of secondary surgery including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were evaluated. Gross survivorship between cohorts was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier gross survivorship curve. A subanalysis was performed comparing patients with Tönnis grade 1 who converted to THA and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with Tönnis grade 1 (age, 42.6 ± 9.0 years; BMI, 28.0 ± 6.3) were successfully matched to 62 patients with Tönnis grade 0 (age, 42.1 ± 8.5, P = .805; BMI, 26.1 ± 3.9, P = .117). Both the Tönnis grade 1 and Tönnis grade 0 groups demonstrated significant improvements regarding all PROs at minimum 10 years (P < .05 for all), except for the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) (P = .066) in the Tönnis grade 1 cohort. No significant difference (P > .05 for all) was noted between cohorts regarding any 10-year PRO. When the authors evaluated comparisons between preoperative and 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year PRO measures, significant differences were noted between cohorts regarding 2-year HOS-ADL (P = .021), Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific subscale (P = .016), and modified Harris Hip Score (P = .026); otherwise, differences did not reach significance. High rates of 10-year MCID and PASS achievement were seen, with no significant differences between groups. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 had significantly higher rates of conversion to THA compared with patients who had Tönnis grade 0 (25.8% vs 4.8%; P = .006). Patients with Tönnis grade 1 had significantly lower gross survivorship compared with those who had Tönnis grade 0 (71.0% vs 85.5%, respectively; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Hip arthroscopy confers comparable postoperative clinical improvements to patients who have FAIS with and without mild OA; however, the benefits among patients with mild OA may be less durable. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 had significantly higher conversion to THA and reduced gross survivorship compared with patients with no evidence of preoperative OA, suggesting that patients with evidence of OA may need to be cautioned on the higher rate of conversion surgery.

All-Endoscopic Modified Krackow Suture for Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Surgical repair of proximal hamstring injuries can relieve pain and restore lower extremity function in active individuals. Whereas traditional surgical techniques are performed via an open approach, more recent endoscopic proximal hamstring repair techniques have proven safe, effective, and potentially associated with fewer complications than open repair. One theorized disadvantage of existing endoscopic techniques is reduced security at the suture-tendon interface, as compared to open surgery, during which a running suture technique, such as a Krackow stitch, may be employed. In this article, we present a technique for increasing suture purchase by performing an all-endoscopic, running, locking stitch during proximal hamstring repair.

A Smartphone App Shows Patients Return to Preoperative Gait Metrics 6 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy, and Gait Metrics Have Low to Moderate Correlations With a Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use a smartphone app to collect gait metrics in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and determine when gait metrics return to preoperative levels and if gait metrics correlate with postoperative hip-specific patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from August 2021 to December 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients downloaded the iPhone app, rHip, at ∼6 months postoperatively, enabling retroactive access to Apple Health data. Gait metrics included step count, step length, and walking speed. Each patient's preoperative baseline was compared to that individual's successive postoperative week metrics. All patients underwent a standard 4-stage rehabilitation protocol. We compared metrics from beginning to end of each phase (i.e., week 1 to 6 for phase 1) and evaluated correlations with patient outcomes. Results: Fifty patients (40 women; age: 31.9 ± 14.5 years) were included. Patients had significantly reduced step count from postoperative weeks 1 to 5 and improved upon baseline at weeks 13 and 16 to 26. Patients had significantly reduced step length from postoperative weeks 1 to 4 and improved upon baseline at weeks 16 and 20. Patients had significantly lower walking speed from postoperative weeks 1 to 6 and improved upon baseline at week 20 (P < .05). Step count significantly improved over phase 1 rehabilitation (P < .05). Step length and walking speed significantly improved over each of phases 1 to 3 (P < .05 for all). Preoperatively, weak correlations were noted between step length and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Physical Function (PF)/Pain, as well as walking speed and Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL)/PROMIS-Pain. At 3 months, moderate correlations were noted between step count and HOS-ADL/12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), step length and HOS-ADL/PROMIS-PF, and walking speed and HOS-ADL/iHOT-12/PROMIS-PF/PROMIS-Pain. At 6 months, weak to moderate correlations were noted between all 3 gait metrics and HOS-ADL. Conclusions: A smartphone app was capable of capturing health data gait metrics. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS returned to baseline levels in step count, step length, and walking speed after phase 1 (6 weeks) of rehabilitation. The most consistent correlations between gait metrics and step count were seen at 3 months, although only weak to moderate. Gait metrics similarly had weak to moderate correlations with HOS-ADL at 6 months. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Endoscopic Partial Proximal Hamstring Repair.

The contemporary treatment of hamstring avulsions has been evolving, as more patients are being identified as having persistently symptomatic partial hamstring tears recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment. The endoscopic hamstring repair allows surgeons improved visualization of the footprint, as well as safe dissection of the sciatic nerve. The present technique article provides a step-by-step technical note to allow for safe and effective surgical treatment of partial hamstring tears.

Intraoperative Use of Ultrasound for Assessing Cam Deformity and Cam Resection.

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy is standard among hip arthroscopist to evaluate and confirm the adequacy of cam resection in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. However, given the inherent limitations of fluoroscopy, additional intraoperative imaging, such as ultrasound, should be pursued. We offer a technique to measure alpha angles intraoperatively using ultrasound to determine adequate cam resection.

Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

BACKGROUND: Limited literature exists regarding how postoperative physical therapy (PT) may affect outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) undergoing hip arthroscopy. Additionally, it is unknown how PT measures relate to traditional orthopaedic patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PURPOSE: To evaluate how the duration of PT may correlate with outcomes in patients with FAIS using both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and standard orthopaedic PRO measures. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients from a single institution who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2013 and 2016 were identified. Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up and fully documented PT notes were included and stratified into 3 cohorts based on timing of PT discharge: 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months. Predictive regression models were developed to analyze the rate of improvement (ROI) in LEFS score as it relates to (1) postoperative day (POD) and (2) postoperative PT session number. Two-year PROs were collected, correlated with LEFS scores, and compared among cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included (mean ± SD age, 34.6 ± 11.7 years; range, 14-55 years). Mean LEFS scores increased significantly from the initial score at 6 weeks, 3 months, and the time of PT discharge (P < .01 for all). The predicted ROI in LEFS score was 3.39% per PT session for sessions 0 to 13, 1.43% for sessions 14 to 27, and 0.37% for sessions 28 to 40. Patients who underwent 3 to 6 months of PT had significantly better Hip Outcome Score (HOS) relative to the 0- to 3-month cohort and significantly better visual analog scale (VAS) scores for satisfaction relative to the 6- to 12-month cohort. The predicted ROI in LEFS score was 0.96% per day from POD 0 to 45, 0.22% from POD 46 to 139, and 0.03% after POD 139. Moderate correlations were seen between LEFS score at the time of discharge and all 2-year PROs as follows: HOS Activities of Daily Living subscale (r = 0.488), HOS Sports-Specific subscale (r = 0.500), modified Harris Hip Score (r = 0.465), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (r = 0.494), VAS pain score (r = -0.346), and VAS satisfaction score (r = 0.459). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS derived substantial benefit from each PT visit during their first 13 PT sessions and then a smaller, yet still meaningful benefit from sessions 13 through 27. After session 40, or approximately 4.5 to 5 months, patients no longer benefited from additional PT sessions. Based on PRO scores, patients discharged from PT between 3 and 6 months had the best 2-year outcomes. LEFS score had moderate correlation with orthopaedic PRO scores.

Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information available to clinicians on outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for labral repairs and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with simultaneous repair of the gluteus medius and/or minimus muscles. PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with labral tears and concomitant gluteal pathology who undergo simultaneous endoscopic labral and gluteus medius and/or minimus repair experience similar outcomes to patients with isolated labral tears who undergo endoscopic labral repair alone. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A matched retrospective comparative cohort study was performed. Patients who underwent gluteus medius and/or minimus repair with concomitant labral repair between January 2012 and November 2019 were identified. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) to patients who underwent labral repair alone. Preoperative radiographs were assessed. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. PRO measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscales, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool, and visual analog scales for pain and satisfaction. Published labral repair minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were utilized for these measures. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients who underwent gluteus medius and/or minimus repair with concomitant labral repair (27 female, 4 male; age, 50.8 ± 7.3 years; BMI, 27.9 ± 5.2) were matched with 93 patients who underwent labral repair alone (81 female, 12 male; age, 50.9 ± 8.1 years; BMI, 28.5 ± 6.2). There were no significant differences in sex (P > .99), age (P = .869), or BMI (P = .592); preoperative radiographic measurements; or preoperative or 2-year postoperative PRO scores (P≥ .081). Changes between preoperative and 2-year postoperative PRO scores were significantly different for both groups for all PROs assessed (P < .001 for all). There were no significant differences in MCID or PASS achievement rates (P≥ .123), with low PASS achievement rates of 40% to 60% found in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who were treated with endoscopic gluteus medius and/or minimus repair with concomitant labral repair demonstrated comparable outcomes with those who were treated with endoscopic labral repair alone.

Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis: Rates of Ossification in Bone Gaps After Consolidation.

ABSTRACT: The authors observe significant bone gaps upon distractor removal in posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO). The purpose of this study was to quantify bone gaps upon distractor removal, determine whether they close over time, determine if they predispose to relapse, and investigate whether age affects rate and degree of re-ossification. The authors performed a retrospective review of PVDO patients and included those with computed tomography (CT) scans at 2 timepoints: 1 at completion of consolidation and another at least 4 months later. Using Mimics software, bone gaps were traced to calculate total surface area. A paired t test and linear regression were used to compare size of bone gaps, presence of relapse, and rates of re-ossification. Sixty-nine patients were identified, with 7 meeting inclusion criteria. Three were under 1 year. Consolidation began 28.3 ± 6.0 days after surgery and continued for 64.9 ± 14.5 days. Length of time between CT scans was 7.5 ± 2.7 months. A significant decrease in bone gaps occurred between scans (33.4 ± 14.6 cm2 versus 19.2 ± 17.2 cm2, P = 0.005). After consolidation, ossification occurred at a rate of 2.4 cm2/month (P = 0.046). The rate of bony regeneration in patients under and over 1 year was 4.3 cm3/month (P = 0.025) and 1.5 cm3/month (P = 0.552), respectively. Despite differential bony regeneration rates, no patient demonstrated relapse. From this study, the authors conclude the following. Calvarial bone gaps are present after PVDO consolidation. These gaps undergo re-ossification at a rate that appears to be faster in infants. Overall, they decrease in size over time. The presence of bone gaps does not correlate with relapse of cranial expansion.

Hematologic complications with age in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.

Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome with leukemia predisposition. An understanding of the hematologic complications of SDS with age could guide clinical management, but data are limited for this rare disease. We conducted a cohort study of 153 subjects from 143 families with confirmed biallelic SBDS mutations enrolled on the North American Shwachman Diamond Registry or Bone Marrow Failure Registry. The SBDS c.258 + 2T>C variant was present in all but 1 patient. To evaluate the association between blood counts and age, 2146 blood counts were analyzed for 119 subjects. Absolute neutrophil counts were positively associated with age (P < .0001). Hemoglobin was also positively associated with age up to 18 years (P < .0001), but the association was negative thereafter (P = .0079). Platelet counts and marrow cellularity were negatively associated with age (P < .0001). Marrow cellularity did not correlate with blood counts. Severe marrow failure necessitating transplant developed in 8 subjects at a median age of 1.7 years (range, 0.4-39.5), with 7 of 8 requiring transplant prior to age 8 years. Twenty-six subjects (17%) developed a myeloid malignancy (16 myelodysplasia and 10 acute myeloid leukemia) at a median age of 12.3 years (range, 0.5-45.0) and 28.4 years (range, 14.4-47.3), respectively. A lymphoid malignancy developed in 1 patient at the age of 16.9 years. Hematologic complications were the major cause of mortality (17/20 deaths; 85%). These data inform surveillance of hematologic complications in SDS.

Nasal Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma in the Pediatric Population: Literature Review and Report of Midline Presentation.

BACKGROUND: Congenital midline nasal masses are rare anomalies and are typically benign nasal dermoid sinus cysts (NDSCs). Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) are even less common, and only a fraction affect sites like the external nose, nasal cavity, nasopharynx, and paranasal sinuses. We review the clinical presentation and treatment of nasal, nasopharyngeal, and paranasal RMSs and report the first documented midline presentation. METHODS: We queried PubMed for articles with titles containing the terms rhabdomyosarcoma or sarcoma botryoides and nose, nasal, paranasal, sinonasal, nasopharynx, or nasopharyngeal. We then searched the references of each included article using the same parameters and continued this process iteratively until no new articles were found. RESULTS: The paranasal sinuses were the most commonly affected site, followed by the nasopharynx, nasal cavity, and external nose. Two patients presented with involvement of the external nose, but each presented with involvement of the right ala rather than a midline mass. The rates of intracranial extension and/or skull base involvement were comparable to those of NDSCs. The alveolar subtype was most common, followed by the embryonal subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Most midline nasal masses are benign; however, we report the first documented presentation of an RMS as a midline nasal mass. Accordingly, RMS should be included in the differential diagnosis of midline nasal masses in the pediatric population. Surgery for midline nasal masses is sometimes delayed due to the risks of interfering with developing structures and early anesthesia. However, early surgical treatment should be considered given this new differential and its predilection for early metastasis.